However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No person shall interfere with the performance of duties of railroad workers by intimidation.

Nevertheless, between March 31, 2018 and 18:26, the Defendant: (a) within the guest room 3 of the Susong STR C train in 2018, the Defendant: (b) reported that the number of customers, who worked in the said train, was sovered by customers; and (c) reported that the number of customers, who were in the said train, was sovered, was sovered by coffee; and (d) led the Defendant to the police.

“Along with sound.”

Accordingly, the above D requested the victim E to assist the railroad worker in the above field, and the victim was present at the above site, and the defendant was "I am her fly fly in the guest room," and the defendant was her fly fly fly, a dangerous object that he was in possession of the victim, and the defendant she threatened the victim out of the above 3 guest room.

After that, the Defendant, who said that the Defendant was the victim “Dao M.D.,” was shaking the victim of the said batteries, and was placed in the passenger emergency warning room in the said No. 3, with a device capable of stopping the train in the passenger emergency warning room, and continued to move to the guest room No. 4 of the said train, thereby getting off the passenger emergency warning server, and putting the chest part of the victim’s chest at least three times.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the performance of duties of railroad workers by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 78 (1) and Article 49 (2) of the Railroad Safety Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 78 (1) and 49 of the Election Safety Act concerning the option of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant interfered with duties by threatening train crew members as dangerous goods.