A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a game room located in Gwangju City D and the second floor, and the defendant B is a person in charge of money exchange affairs in the above game room.

From May 2, 2014 to June 19:10, 2014, the Defendants conspired to offer money to customers in the game machine, and Defendant A used the game to offer points to obtain points on the game machine screen, and to offer them to customers who gain points on the screen of the game machine, and calculated 10,000 won per point, and issued a meal ticket, invitation ticket, lottery ticket, and lottery ticket to customers. Defendant B used to have customers go in the vicinity of the game room, and exchanged the points acquired through the use of the game product. Defendant B used to exchange the points on the game in 9,00 won per meal ticket, 45,00 won per ticket, 90,000 won per ticket per ticket, 90,000 won per ticket per ticket, and 90,000 won per ticket, per ticket.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. F and each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the Defendants’ Selection of Punishment: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Reasons for sentencing under Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A’s criminal act is committed, his criminal act is committed, his criminal act is divided, there is no criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and supports his parents who are not healthy. However, Defendant A is a person who operates the game of this case, and the size of the game place is not small, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following:

2. Defendant B is fined two times for the same crime.