A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (five million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime for about five months as a manager of the game site of this case, and the Defendant committed the instant crime at approximately six months since he/she was released from prison, and there is a disadvantage to the Defendant, such as the Defendant committed the instant crime.

On the other hand, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, that there is no criminal record of the defendant, that the defendant was not a direct profit through the crime as the actual owner of the game of this case, that he was employed as an employee, and that he was employed by the employee, that the defendant's wife wants the defendant's wife without good health, and that the defendant's wife does not commit any crime and does not commit any more faithfully.

In full view of such circumstances and other circumstances as the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant records and pleadings, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. As such, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.