All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. According to the evidence of mistake of facts (not guilty part) the Defendant could have found that there was an intentional murder of the victims at the time, but the first instance court acquitted the victims of attempted murder, which is the primary charge of the instant case, on the ground that there is a lack of evidence to acknowledge such intentional murder. In so determining, the first instance court erred by misapprehending the facts. 2) The punishment sentenced by the first instance court of unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the first instance court (e.g., ine., the defendant) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the prosecutor’s assertion of mistake of facts, the first instance court determined that the evidence alone submitted was insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had been

Examining these judgments of the first instance court closely with the records, the prosecutor's allegation in this part is without merit.

B. As to the assertion on unfair sentencing, the defendant has an attitude to distinguish his own crime in his name, the victim G and the original agreement was reached with the victim G, the victim's deposit of KRW 500,00 for the victim F, the health of the defendant is not good, and there is no penalty heavier than the fine.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with a knife several times, resulting in a knife, and the method of the knife is very dangerous. In particular, the degree of the injury inflicted by the victim G could have been died if it is serious. The defendant attempted to conceal his criminal act, such as hiding the knife the knife used by him and returning back to the sick room again, and asking him to the effect that knife knife knife is.