The appeal is dismissed.

(In fact or misunderstanding of legal principles) The defendant F, first of all, was the victim F, with a view to defending the defendant, he did not injure the victim, but did not injure the victim. The defendant's act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act.

Judgment

In a case where it is reasonable to view that an act by a perpetrator, rather than for defending the victim’s unjust attack, was committed with the intent of attacking one another, and that the act was committed against it, the act is an act of attack and has the nature of an act of attack at the same time as an act of attack, and therefore, it cannot be deemed a legitimate act.

(2) The Defendant and the victim met with the face of the Defendant at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, and in the process of the installation of drilling equipment at the time and place of the instant case, the Defendant and the victim met with the Defendant’s face, satisfing with the Defendant’s face, satisfing with the Defendant’s batfing and drinking bat with the Defendant’s chest, etc., and satch with the Defendant’s chest, etc., and satisf with each other. (2) The victim suffered injuries, such as fat, etc. caused by the instant fighting, and received visiting the hospital on the day of the instant case, and (3) the victim received a summary order from the Defendant and received the Defendant’s attack and defense against the Defendant, by taking account of the following circumstances: “The Defendant was subject to a summary order from the Defendant’s face, and was subject to the Defendant’s attack and defense at the same time and at the same time.”