When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 00:40 on December 13, 2013, the Defendant expressed that “I wish to see, “I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see the part of the above D, and me will like to see the above D's chest with his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the patrol and suppression of the above D 112 crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;