However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 08:05 on August 10, 2013, the Defendant driven a sealed truck of Cwing Franchis, and had the Defendant go straight ahead of the water-franced road in the east-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, by straight lines to the home-fluor. Since the traffic control is performed by signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a private-distance intersection where traffic control is performed by the signal apparatus, a person who is in charge of driving a motor vehicle is well aware of the signal, and was under the duty of care to prevent the accident by safely driving the signal in accordance with the signal, due to the negligence of yellow fluencing the signal, and caused the victim D(66 years old) (3) and 44 times to the home-flucing line, who turn to the intersection from the border on the side of the said cargo vehicle, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the injury of the three and 4 times to the river-fluc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident reports, photographs, and diagnostic certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, primary crime, comprehensive insurance, and smoothly agreed with the victim) in the suspension of execution;