However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On February 19, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime at the same court on October 19, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 18, 2012, at around 00:03, the Defendant driven a car with C low-speed without obtaining a driver's license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.186% from the road in front of the public playground in Pyeongtaek-si, to the road in front of the Korean Industrial Complex in Pyeongtaek-si.

As a result, the defendant has violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice and drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Investigation report, and investigation report (report on the current status of driving without a license);

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (attached to summary orders);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture is that the defendant, even though he had a history of criminal punishment on three occasions due to drinking driving, has a high possibility of criticism in that the blood alcohol concentration in the instant case is 0.186%.

However, the defendant seems to have been aware of and reflect on the crime of this case, and the defendant is punished three times by a fine due to drinking driving.