2. It is recognized that the amount of damage to the instant crime was relatively small, and that the victim was unable to punish by mutual consent with the victim.

However, considering the defendant's past record of punishment due to fraud, larceny, etc., which had been 20 times and has been sentenced to punishment due to larceny, etc., and recidivism in three months after being sentenced to punishment due to larceny, etc., and other various sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family environment, circumstances and result of the crime of this case, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.