A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for six months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Defendant

A is the business owner of the business place of Mad from April 2014 to March 25, 2015, which is the third floor of Mad' from the 3rd floor located in Mad', and Defendant B is the person who viewed the carter of the above business place.

From July 22, 2014 to March 25, 2015, the Defendants conspired in collusion with each other to establish three smuggling in which shower facilities and bed, five general marina rooms, and four employees waiting rooms in the above D, and let customers find such places have a sexual intercourse with E, and receive 12-130,000 won from customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Real estate lease contract and business registration certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Additional collection of Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the total business period shall be 247 days, or the public prosecutor shall be 245 days, and the average daily profit shall be 50,000 won, since Defendant A stated that he/she had obtained profits from the average of 5-100,000 won per day after deducting his/her employee shares while operating the said business at an investigative agency. The average daily profit shall be 50,000 won. The number of business days from July 22, 2014 to March 25, 2015, which is the business period of the instant crime, was punished for additional collection as 245 days (the total business

(2) The grounds for sentencing include: (a) the period of business of the instant crime for sentencing is considerably long; and (b) the fact that Defendant B was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime; (c) the fact that the Defendants are both aware of the facts of the crime; and (d) the fact that Defendant A has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime.