For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, and ordered the Defendant to restrict employment for one year at child and juvenile-related institutions and welfare facilities for the disabled.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the prohibition of disadvantageous changes and the exemption requirements

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.