beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.10.13 2016고단956

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a freight vehicle B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) (2016 Height956).

On February 20, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license at around 00:40 on February 20, 2016, driven the above cargo and proceeded with the virtue ginseng distance in the Socuk-dong, which is in the Socuk-dong.

It is an intersection where signal lights are installed, and the vehicle stopped under the signals is located on the front side, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely operate the driver by reducing the speed or properly operating the steering and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop it and was negligent to stop on the front bank, and thereby, received the part following the victim C's Maz car, which was the victim C, who was standing in the signal signal in the front bank.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as brain salva which requires treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim E, such as salve sale, tensions, etc. which require treatment for about two weeks, at the same time, 2,655,618 won at the repair cost of the above salvator, and escaped without immediately stopping the above salp vehicle and without taking necessary measures.

2. On February 20, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act [2016 Height956] around 00:30 on February 20, 2016, in driving the freight vehicles under the above paragraph (1), the Defendant continued to change the directioner from the door raw ginseng distance located in the Scong-dong at the Scong-si, without using the directioner, on two consecutive occasions. In the same manner, the Defendant scam the central line from the Scong-dong located in the Scong-dong, and then, without taking any measures.