2. The crime of this case is deemed to have taken account of the following: (a) the crime of this case was committed by acquiring the money from the previous generation by means of forging and shipping a false lease loan system for the stabilization of the residence of ordinary people; (b) the fact that the method and content of the crime were defective; (c) the damage caused by the crime of this case was not recovered; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and all sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, are not led to the crime of this case; and (c) the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, even if it appears that the gains acquired by the crime of this case would have been excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.