When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “D dan” operated by the victim C in Jeju Island, “D dan,” the victim entered the monthly salary of December 26, 2013, and borrowed transportation expenses.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price or to pay the borrowed money even if he received the payment or borrowed the money from the victim.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim, received 320,000 won or more from the victim, and received 30,000 won or more in cash as transportation expenses.

2. On December 24, 2013, the Defendant deceivings the victim in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph at the same place, and received from the victim an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 420,000,00 from the victim and delivery of KRW 50,00 in cash.

3. On December 25, 2013, the Defendant deceivings the victim in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph at the same place, and received from the victim an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 320,000,00 from the victim and delivery of KRW 320,000,

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine: Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) and 38 (2) and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order of provisional payment: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and other matters: It shall be decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the motive and circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, occupation of the defendant and family relations are higher;