변상금부과처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. In the first instance court’s judgment, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit with the purport that the Defendant sought revocation of each disposition listed in the separate sheet Nos. 5 through 8 as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 8, which the Defendant initially filed against the Plaintiff. Of the main claims, the court of first instance dismissed all of the parts for seeking confirmation of invalidity of the dispositions listed in the column Nos. 1, 3 through 7, and for seeking confirmation of invalidity of the dispositions listed in the column Nos. 5 through 7, of the preliminary claims listed in the same list No. 7, and for seeking revocation of the dispositions listed in the column No. 8, of the preliminary claims, among the dispositions listed in the same list No. 7, the same list No. 2, of the main claims, and the dispositions listed in the column No. 3 through No. 7, and all of the dispositions listed in the column No. 8 were invalid.
Therefore, since only the defendant appealed against the part against it, the scope of the trial of this court is limited to the portion of the common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common common people
2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The court’s explanation is to dismiss “1. 21. 21. 201” of the 4th judgment of the court of first instance as “3. 24. 2009. 3. 2009. 207Da51536, Dec. 13, 2007.” In addition, “the invalidation is inevitable” of the 7th judgment under Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and “the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the attached Form)” under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.