2. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant who intrudes on his residence to steals property in the daytime, but did not commit the attempted crime, or stolen property owned by the victim F. In light of the applicable method of the crime, there are many times of criminal records that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and there is no agreement with the victims. However, although the defendant all of the crime of this case is led to confession and reflect, the defendant is deemed to have committed each of the crimes of this case, he appears to have committed each of the crimes of this case, including the fact that the degree of damage of this case was totaled to 2,00 won, and 2,000 won, and 1,000 won, and the damaged goods were returned to the victim F. In full view of various circumstances, the prosecutor's assertion is not accepted since the court below's punishment is reasonable.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.