However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle B with a vehicle in size.

At around 17:50 on January 27, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded with the two-lane road located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, in order to drive the two-lane in the opposite line while driving along one-lane from the direction of the ridge distance. Since the center line of the yellow solid line is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty to pay an internship at the permissible point of the U.S.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and hered the center line with the driver’s negligence, and led the victim C(33 years of age) driving from the fluoral distance from the fluoral distance to the fluoral road by using one lane. The left part of the fluoral road operated by the victim C(33 years of age) was shocked by the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “a satisfying a satfy in the opposite side,” which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Handling of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (amended by Act No. 62(1) of the Criminal Code) of the Criminal Code (amended by Act No. 6220, Jan. 1, 2006) provides that the Defendant shall be sentenced to the following: