beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.09.24 2013고정594

부정수표단속법위반

Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around October 25, 2010, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Gyeongnam Bank's dong branch in the name of the president of the C Co., Ltd. and entered into a check contract with the Gyeongnam Bank's dong branch in the name of the president.

At the end of November 2010, the Defendant issued one copy of the number of shares per check E, the par value 3,000 won, and the date of issuance on April 30, 201, and the payer and the branch of the Bank in Yong-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant corrected the date of issuance and the face value to KRW 0,000,000,000,000,000,000 won from G offices located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant issued a copy of the check number E, the par value 3,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and the date of issuance was supplemented on April 18, 2012 and presented for payment within the payment proposal period, but did not receive a disposition of transaction suspension on June 24, 20

Around October 2010, the Defendant issued a check number H and a check number 50 million won on January 16, 2013 on the date of issuance, and presented a payment proposal within the period for which payment was made by the holder, but did not receive it as a non-transaction.

2. The above facts charged are an offense falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act and where a person who has issued or prepared a check pursuant to Article 2(4) of the same Act collects the check, a case in which a public prosecution cannot be instituted. Since the defendant recovered all the checks indicated in the facts charged after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.