자동차운전면허취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 21, 2017, the Plaintiff refused to take a drinking test without justifiable grounds despite having been requested by a police officer to respond to a drinking test.
B. Accordingly, on July 13, 2017, the Defendant issued a revocation disposition for a driver’s license (class I large, class I ordinary, and class II motorcycle) against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff asserted that he had been engaged in an exemplary social life, such as running driving for his family’s livelihood and engaging in ordinary volunteer activities, the instant disposition exceeded the scope of discretion or abused discretion.
B. Determination 1 as to whether an administrative disposition exceeds the scope of discretion under the social norms or abused discretionary power ought to be determined by comparing and balancing the degree of infringement on public interest and the disadvantages suffered by an individual due to the relevant administrative disposition by objectively examining the content of the offense committed as the ground for disposition, the public interest to be achieved by the relevant administrative act, and all relevant circumstances.
In this case, even if the criteria for disciplinary administrative disposition are prescribed in the form of Ordinance, it is nothing more than that prescribed in the administrative affairs rules inside the administrative agency, and thus, it is not effective externally to guarantee citizens or courts. Whether such disposition is legitimate or not shall be determined in accordance with the contents and purport of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, not only the above disposition criteria, but also
Although the disposition can not be said to be legitimate immediately, the above disposition disposition does not in itself conform with the Constitution or the laws or regulations, or a punitive administrative disposition in accordance with the above disposition disposition is imposed, and the relevant laws and regulations.