However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a representative who operates a “D” company from 202 of the C Building 202 at both weeks.

The defendant at the Government Tax Office on April 25, 2011, while the defendant from January 1, 2011 to the same year.

3. Until July 25, 2013, the list of total tax invoices and the list of total tax invoices stating false amounts of 975,129,000 won was submitted from that time to July 25, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes in the separate sheet, as if the goods were supplied to the above company during the above period, as if the goods were supplied to the company with the goods equivalent to KRW 129,526,00,000 were supplied to the company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A list of total electronic tax invoices and a written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to submit a business registration certificate and to attach a list of the list of electronic tax invoices);

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act and Article 10 (3) 3 of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act (the crime in this case shall be selected by imprisonment, taking into consideration the following factors: the crime is committed in a manner that disturbs sound commercial transactions and undermines transparency in taxes; the crime quality is not good; the period of the crime in this case; the amount entered in the list of total tax invoices by

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) that provides a false tax invoice at the request of a customer to maintain the relationship with the customer, and that the defendant has no criminal history of the same kind of crime);