1. Around August 25, 2014, the Defendant forged a loan contract, etc. under C in the name of the Defendant, including “3,000,000 won”, “C” in the customer name column, “D” in the resident registration number column, “B, and sole” in the address column, etc. using a computer, at the Defendant’s house of 101, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant forged a loan contract, etc. under six times from the time until October 7, 2014, as indicated in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a loan transaction agreement, etc. in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations or certification of facts, for the purpose of exercising a loan from the Love Loan Co., Ltd.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), exercised a loan transaction contract in the name of C over six times from the time, from October 7, 2014, by transmitting and using a forged loan transaction contract as if the contract was duly concluded, to employees in charge of the company, who are aware of the forgery.

3. The defrauded, at the time, at the time, at the time, at the place described in paragraph (1) above, by deceiving a staff member in charge of the Victim Love Loan Co., Ltd. as if he had been completed by the said method, and then, he received KRW 3 million in the name of the loan from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of C managed by the Defendant on the same day from the victim from October 7, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and each Criminal Act for the crimes in question;