However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In 2010, the Defendant introduced the L team leader of the K department of the J agency, a department in charge of planning and supervision of new construction and repair works of schools within I in the jurisdiction of I (the head of the current J agency, the head of the department in charge of planning and supervision of the new construction and repair works of schools within I to allow L to select a person as a supply company of the construction works ordered by the J agency, such as L, in solicitation to the person in charge of the J agency, such as L, and in return, to receive money and valuables from the L company.

1. The Defendant’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) stated to the effect that “A private person’s business operation of the KM products will be selected as a creative supply company by using a friendly relationship with the public officials of the K department of the JJ institution if the ratio of the supply price of M products is operating expenses,” and that a private person would be paid 10-20% of the supply amount if the supply contract of the KM company is to be concluded.

On May 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) solicited the said L L L L L L, which was in charge of construction design in the J facilities, to reflect the said L L L L’s construction project in the design of the school construction project at which the order of the KJ institution was given; (b) entered into a contract for the construction work of Mhoho Lake of KRW 10,560,000 in construction cost in relation to the “P elementary school environmental improvement construction project” in this L’s “P elementary school construction project; (c) was issued from the L’s Daegu Bank account in the name of the Defendant’s wife Q Q in the name of mediation around January 13, 2014; and (d) was issued from November 11, 2016 to November 32, 2016 to arrange and arrange the Defendant to receive some of the amount of charges in the name of the JJ institution, which was charged by the Defendant in return for the omission of the amount of charges in the attached Table 138,198.

was issued by the Corporation.

The defendant is a public official.