On November 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on June 18, 2015.

[2015 Highest 4436] The Defendant: (a) around 13:00 on October 2, 2015, at the “E convenience store” operated by the victim D located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) 1 C without calculating the amount.

If the victim requires the calculation of the food victim, he/she interfered with the victim's convenience store business by forcing the victim to interfere with the victim's convenience store business by putting the disturbance on the floor, putting him/her on the wall, putting him/her on the wall, putting him/her on the wall, leaving him/her uneass and leaving him/her off.

[2015 Highest 4969]

1. On November 6, 2015, at the convenience store operated by the victim G in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the part of November 17:30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the purchase price even if he/she pays the purchase price; (b) he/she acted as if he/she calculates the purchase price; and (c) he/she had I, an employee of the Defendant take 1,300 won of the market price at the cooling.

The delivery of property was received by allowing the permission of food.

2. 업무 방해 피고인은 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서, 종업원 I가 피고인에게 소주 대금을 계산 하라고 요구하자 “ 씨 발 년 아. 좃도 마음대로 해라.

In addition, this article argues that the victim's convenience store business should be avoided by force by moving the disturbance for about one hour, such as standing in the store, blocking the passage and drinking alcohol, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 4436]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared D or K [2015 high group 4969];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. A report of investigation (related to the statements of a victim and witness by telephone);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A response to inquiries, such as criminal history, and a report of investigation (the repeated offense).