If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

B and Defendant A are between company C and company C in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

B, around 23:00 on July 6, 2012, around 23:0, 305 of the building DD, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, a work partner, performed drinking together with Defendant A, who is not good for the peace. At this point, Defendant A had talked with Defendant A, but did not have any misunderstanding, and Defendant A had any misunderstanding of misunderstanding, and among which, at that point, Defendant A had any defect in the bath theory that Defendant A “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y Y YY YY Y Y YY

While the Defendant was in a conflict with B at the same time and at the same place, the Defendant was first able to resist the face of the Defendant B in his/her hands by setting up against B with his/her hand and her hand at one time, and the workplace fellows, who had been in his/her hands, received the Defendant B’s entry rank with his/her head at the horse.

As a result, the defendant added to B the sacropic sacropic sacropic sacropics and sacropic sacropic sacropics which require two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (the first offense is reflected and the circumstances of fighting, etc. are considered);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.