If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Around 17:00 on October 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as gathering of the victim E (55 years) a dangerous object (50cm in width, 50cm in length, 50cm in length, 50cm in length) with a cafeteria located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and 1st floor; and (b) raising the victim’s head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the receipt of a report on damage (proof No. 1) and a report on damage (proof No. 3);

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the confinement of the workhouses [the Defendant and his defense counsel did not display any sign, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, F, an employee at a restaurant, was cited by the investigative agency to the extent that the Defendant and the victim conflict with each other from this court to this court.

In particular, in this Court, F did not display both the Defendant and the Victim in a false manner, but when the other Party was the head.

In full view of the fact that the defendant's snowbrow part at the time, and the fact that the dispute seems to have been serious enough to tear, the above argument is without merit.

In light of the sentencing conditions indicated in the trial of this case, such as the fact that there was a history of criminal punishment against the defendant for the same reason of sentencing, both assault and assault were committed, and that the victim did not want punishment against the defendant, etc., the punishment shall be determined like the order.