If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 4, 2017, the Defendant, at around 22:20 on March 4, 2017, was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s failure to pay rent in danran, operated by the Victim D (Min, 62 years of age) located in Jeju, and the Defendant, who raised the Defendant’s complaint with “Is the Defendant to pay rent in Gain.”

“Along with the fact that he or she had been living alone, she was dissatisfied with the fact that the victim E (the 54 years old) who is an employee by avoiding the disturbance, and that he or she met, she was the same as the punishment, and she was not the same as that of the punishment.

The victim’s entertainment business was hindered and assaulted by force, such as taking a large bath, cutting off the chest part of E with his hand, thereby obstructing the victim’s entertainment bar business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of D and E;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. To reduce a fine for a summary order by taking into account the fact that the defendant reflects the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the motive for committing the crime, etc.;