2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendants are those who are engaged in loading and unloading of containers at the Busan New Port.

1. On November 16, 2012, Defendant A came to be a trial of the lower value of the Defendant B and the lower lower fly fire, which is the main owner of the fly, in front of the catagu, Jin-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Dang-si, 18:15.

Accordingly, on the ground that the Defendant asked the victims of the Jinhae Police Station Emba, the victims who were dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of D, and that the case was asked by Jinhae Police Station Emba, G, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victims by openly 10 minutes out of being 3 to 4 residents, such as: (a) the victims of the instant case, such as: (b) the victims, who sent to the scene, and (c) the call to the head of the Sinhae Police Station Emba; (b) the victims of the instant case.

2. Defendant B, on the same grounds as in the preceding paragraph at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, took a bath to the victims, such as: (a) Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, talked about 10 minutes of a large voice among the residents’ three to four persons, including: (b) she takes a bath to “Igs, chchop fom,” and (c) she took a public official’s bath to

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint and I statements;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the concurrent crimes; and

3. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

4. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.

5. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.