However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from around 15:00 to 16:00, the Defendant: (b) had a victim D (at the age of 58) who first worked in the middle-gu C building, and the Defendant’s house located in 311 household as well as the victim D (at the age of 58) who was working in the middle-gu C building in the middle-gu Office of the Defendant’s house, and had a kiscing for the victim’s entrance into the kis; (c) had a kisc; (d) had a kisced kisc with his fingers; and (d) had the victim kisced off panty by putting his kis and pansc

High Court's ruling was made.

As a result, the Defendant’s refusal by hand exceeded the victim’s lower rank by force, and forced the victim’s body to leave the victim’s body, forced the victim’s resistance, and attempted to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim’s sexual organ by holding the victim’s negative body unbucks and hand over the victim’s bucks. However, the Defendant did not have the sexual organ, but did not have the intent to commit an attempted act.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to have sexual intercourse with the victim, but he did not have his sexual organ but failed to have his sexual organ.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Mitigation of attempted punishment: Articles 25(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to notify disclosure, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for committing a sexual crime before committing the instant crime, and thus, has a risk of recidivism or recidivism of sexual assault against the Defendant;

It is difficult to conclude this case, and in this case, the registration of personal information against the defendant and the demotion for sexual assault treatment.