However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 14, 2015, at around 00:34, the Defendant discovered 6 wooden lelet (7,000 won per opening price) accumulated by the victim D from the outer wall of the 1st floor of the building of the 4th floor of Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and posted a fire on the above wooden lelet by putting them up with a single lebrogate and attaching a single lebide to the surrounding areas without any justifiable reason. On June 14, 2015, at around 00:42, the Defendant tried to turn back to the site again in the same manner, and then refused the fire again, around 00:48 on June 14, 2015, at around 00:48, the Defendant added to the above wooden lelet on which it was loaded.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the above tree path in such a way as above and caused a situation in which a fire can spread to nearby printing offices, etc., thereby causing public danger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 167 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for sentencing that are advantageous to the following)

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for six months to five years;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria [Determination of types] general criteria for fire prevention. Type 3 (Setting of Types) (Setting of General Goods Fire Prevention): - Reduction factors: Where actual damage is minor (Determination of the recommended area] mitigation area [Determination of the recommended area] mitigation area (decision of the recommended area] 6 months to 1 year; and

3. The punishment shall be determined as ordered by the Sentencing Committee, taking into consideration the following factors: the fact that the actual damage to the sentence is minor; the defendant has no record of punishment except for two previous offenses; the confession and reflect of the crime; the circumstances of the crime in this case; the circumstances after the crime; the age, character and conduct, health conditions of the defendant; and the sentencing criteria of the Sentencing Committee: