A. The reasoning for this Court is as follows.

The parts in this subsection are as follows:

Except for the parts added in the paragraph, it is the same as the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

B. The main part (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (1) 4th to 4th day below, and 2th day below.

‘(B) It is sufficiently possible to verify actual income by means of a broad interpretation of the scope of income verification data prescribed in Article 4 subparag. 7 of the instant public notice. ① The gross income of HV operated by the Plaintiff and G as the same business from HV from June 29, 2003 to June 28, 2005 shall be KRW 162,057,690; ② The gross income of F Research Institute from 203.5 to June 28, 2005 shall be the total income of 3.5 (the sales expenses shall be deducted); ② The total amount of KRW 23-2 (the current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of tax officials) or the total amount of KRW 23.5 (the current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of current status of tax officials).

Here, 206,670,656 won or 207,348,178 won and damages for delay, which the plaintiff has reserved and received an objection.