Judgment

According to evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the Defendant’s legal statement, criminal history, and a reply letter of inquiry (A), and each statement of an investigation report (Attachment of a non-prosecution decision) by this court, the Defendant was lawfully admitted and investigated. At the time, the Defendant entered his/her external speculation in the same place as the date and place recorded in the facts charged. At the time, the Defendant was suffering from the said restaurant, and the Defendant had both the above cafeteria and the outer boom, and the Defendant was suspended from indictment for the larceny on April 26, 2017, which was the date and time prior to the date indicated in the facts charged.

However, according to evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, such as the list of video and seizure (voluntary submission) of the CD (CCTV) and each list of seizure list, the Defendant stayed for about 3 hours at the restaurant as stated in the summary of the facts charged, and one of the above two persons remains together with the Defendant. At that time, the Defendant and the Defendant had been at least 8 bottled. The Defendant and the Defendant got to run the above restaurant first at the same time as indicated in the summary of the facts charged, and the Defendant got to go to the above restaurant, and the Defendant took out of the above restaurant in order to put one’s bank and external box in hand, putting them out of the entrance or the right park in order, and immediately after leaving the entrance or the right park, putting them out of the entrance.