The defendant is a foreigner of Chinese nationality.

피고인은 2018. 8. 2. 18:13 경 인천 중구 사동 28-11에 있는 노상에서 중국 채팅어 플인 위챗을 통해 중국인인 일명 E의 지시를 받고 장물이라는 점을 알면서도 국내 장 물업자인 F으로부터 도난 또는 분실된 피해자 불상의 휴대전화 36대가 들어 있던 박스를 건네받은 후, 그 무렵 E이 보낸 성명 불상의 여성에게 위 휴대전화들을 건네주는 방법으로 장물인 휴대전화를 운반하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Investigation report ( Case number 2018-4674 is about the video image of accomplice F);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (as to the analysis of CCTV around the site);

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, the grounds for sentencing of punishment [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of punishment [the scope of recommendations]]] does not exist in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) [the person who is subject to special sentencing] (the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] was delivered 36 mobile phones from the person who is well-known by the defendant without knowledge and was delivered 36 mobile phones,

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the record, such as the fact that it is difficult to understand, and the attitude of a serious reflection is not shown in the investigation, and the non-cooperative attitude is shown in the investigation.