특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 28, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Seog District Court Branch of Daegu District Court on the following grounds: (a) a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Daegu District Court on December 1, 201; and (b) a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Daegu District Court on February 14, 201; and (c) a fine at the Daegu District Court on February 14, 201.
On February 10, 2013, the Defendant driven a “new church” located in the outer village of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, in order to ensure that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.141 percent with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.141 percent, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the “new church” located in the outer village of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seobuk-gu to the road of 100 meters away from the ordinary four kilometers away.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a B low-priced car;
On February 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above high-speed car, and led the Defendant to drive the road 100 meters away from the “new church located in the outer village of the Dansan-gun of the Gyeongbuk-do, North Korea, to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right.
At that time, it was a road where a median line is installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle, operate the steering system and the steering system accurately, and operate the steering system and the steering system with the duty of care to safely drive without harming the central line.
Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant neglected to drive a blood alcohol concentration of 0.141% while he was unable to drive in a normal condition, and neglected to drive the center line on the left side of the driving vehicle of the Defendant, by neglecting to do so, and neglecting to drive the center on the right side of the Plaintiff, who was a victim C (e.g., those aged 62) who was driving at the outer village-ri side from the flat-distance flood bank, was driving at the left side of the driver's vehicle.