beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.01 2017노2295

상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant: (a) found in the office to receive money promised at the time to receive money from the injured party; and (b) promoted the same; (c) provided that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the injured party for about 21 days by keeping the table table, which had been used in the office; and (d) provided the victim’s chest.

2. The statements made at the investigating agency and the court of first instance of victims D are consistent and concrete.

In full view of the fact that D received hospital treatment on the following day of the instant case and received a written diagnosis of injury on the same day, it is sufficient to find the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

The defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.