However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 8, 2016, 00:30, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the D main office located in C at Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si on December 8, 2016; and (b) on the ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship’s ship.

20 60 20

In this soon, this brush bomb, the victim's shoulder was tight at least five times by hand, and the police officer's 112 bucked at one time in order to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Notification to a department related to the reporting of 112 Incident, the date of service, and copies of identification cards;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor (the following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing shall be considered):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is that there is no person [a person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to January 4) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the scope of recommendations] (the scope of recommendations] (the interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) [a person subject to special sentencing] (a decision subject to sentence] of the instant crime is not good in light of the details and methods of the crime, and there is no record that the Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime or violent crime

However, in consideration of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects against the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime or of the fine exceeding the criminal records since 2009, and the conditions of all kinds of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the same punishment as the order shall be determined