【Criminal Power】 On July 7, 1994, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc., and three years of suspension of the execution on May 8, 1998, and was sentenced to six months from the Daegu District Court’s imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on July 20, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to the imprisonment with prison labor for four months from the Incheon District Court’s subsidiary branch for the punishment of larceny, etc. on September 7, 2007, and was sentenced to six months from the same support on September 7, 2007, and was sentenced to one year and eight months from the imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Incheon District Court on September 11, 2008, and on January 30, 2010, the sentence was completely executed

【Habitually, at around 15:00 on October 25, 2010, the Defendant used 18 KK (5 kh) gress in total, with 3,100,000 precious metals and 8 cash hress in total, and with 50,000 won in swine khress in the house of the victim D, 15:0,000, the Defendant used a theft of 18 KK (5 khs) gress in which gas pipes were dried up and dried up to the house of the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The defendant's log personal records (two copies of evidence), monetary records (3,4 copies of evidence);

1. Purchase account books and precious metal of pawned area;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the date of release);

1. Habituality of the judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to which the dampness of the crime in this case is recognized in view of the methods of crime in this case, the identity of the criminal records of the defendant, and the frequency and duration of the crimes revealed therein;

1. Relevant Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

2. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act, among repeated offenders, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the fact that the defendant again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crimes and that he can have the same criminal records.