When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

"2015 High Court 1924"

1. On November 25, 2014, from around 01:20 to 06:20 on the same day, the Defendant acquired property benefits by deceiving the victim as if he were to pay the PC even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the PC, and by failing to pay 5,000 won for using PC provided by the victim.

2. On November 22, 2014, from around 13:16 to 18:00 of the same day, the Defendant acquired property benefits by deceiving the victim as if he were to pay the PC even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the PC even if using the PC, and by failing to pay 5,000 won of the PC.

The Defendant acquired property benefits by failing to pay KRW 4,000 after using PC for about 3 hours and 40 minutes until 20:50 on October 24, 2014, even though he did not have any ability or intent to pay the price even after using PC.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of F and J;

1. C’s self-written statement;

1. Details of use of the PC bank;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.