2. There is no special change in circumstances in the trial about sentencing.

The lower court has already determined the punishment by fully taking into account all the circumstances that the Defendant asserts on the grounds of appeal, and such determination is within the reasonable scope of sentencing.

I seem to appear.

Defendant

We do not accept the argument.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, since the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the Defendant is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act after the judgment of conviction on criminal facts is finalized following the end of the application of the statutes of the court below is clearly omitted due to mistake, and thus ex officio