특수상해등
The judgment below
The guilty part shall be reversed.
Defendant
A. Imprisonment of one year and two months, and Defendant B’s imprisonment of eight months, respectively.
1. The scope of this Court’s trial (Defendant A) sentenced Defendant A to a judgment dismissing a public prosecution on each of the charges of assaulting each of the facts charged against Defendant A, and sentenced the Defendants guilty of the remaining facts charged.
As to this, only the Defendants filed an appeal against the guilty portion, the dismissal of the above indictment became final and conclusive.
Therefore, the scope of this court's judgment is limited to the conviction part of the judgment below.
2. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each of the punishments of the lower court (one and half years of imprisonment with labor for Defendant A, and eight months of imprisonment with labor for Defendant B) against the Defendants.
3. The judgment of the Defendant A sent back to the new wall the victims known to the general public with a pipe, etc., and threatened the victims not to report.
In addition, the police officer who tried to arrest himself as an offender in the act of violence committed assault and thereby inflict an injury.
Defendant
B led the crime of joint injury in this case, which led the victims to assault the victims.
In addition, victims were assaulted without any special reason.
The contents and attitudes of each of the crimes of this case are very poor.
Defendants were subject to the juvenile protection case transfer disposition several times due to violence related delinquency.
However, for the first time, the defendant A agreed with the victim of the crime of special injury and intimidation, S, T, V, and the defendant B further agreed with the victim of the crime of assault.
Accordingly, Defendant B agreed with all victims of this case.
The age of the Defendants is the beginning of 20th century.
When the transfer of juvenile protection cases is excluded, Defendant A has no record of punishment, and Defendant B has only record of fine once.
In full view of such circumstances and other circumstances as the Defendant’s character and conduct, the environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court shall be the Defendant.