약정금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal or addition as follows.
2. Parts used or added;
A. The second 13-party 2 of the judgment of the first 13-party 13-party 2 "Seongsung Life Insurance" is "Songsung Fire Marine Insurance".
B. The third party of the judgment of the first instance to the second party of the first instance, “80,000,000 won was donated to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff paid approximately KRW 40,000,000 as the amount of criminal agreement was required.” The Plaintiff donated KRW 80,000 to the Plaintiff.”
C. The third parallel 4 to 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance stated that "the defendant paid the sum of 10,828,653 (the new card 3,002, 180 Samsung Card 4,55,477 lot cards 3,270,996)" "the defendant paid the sum of 10,828,653 won (the new card 3,002,180 won Samsung Card 4,55,477 won) of Samsung Card 3,270,996."
At the end of the third seven proceedings in the judgment of the first instance, “The entries in the evidence Nos. 2 and 6 and the purport of the whole pleadings” shall be added.
E. From 4th to 11th day of the first instance judgment, the part of the judgment “(b)” was followed as follows.
The records in Gap evidence 10-1 and 2 (written recording) and the result of the plaintiff's personal examination of the court of the first instance alone, among the inherited property of the deceased C (hereinafter "the deceased"), the apartment of this case between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the defendant agreed that the plaintiff will divide the inherited property of the deceased C (hereinafter "the deceased").
In the case of the deceased’s inherited property, the Defendant received financial assets, such as deposits, after completing the registration of ownership transfer on the apartment of this case, and agreed to pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s inherited shares in the value of the
(see the fourth page) It is not sufficient to recognize the complaint, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Rather, in the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff filed on June 2015.