except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:35 on April 15, 2014, the Defendant discovered the circumstance E (53) of the police box belonging to the Suwon Police Station D (53) Police Station, which was under the control of the vehicle, and, without any particular reason, she took the bath to E, “I see this ring, spherb, so I see it by hand, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers’ order by walking the E’s bridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of public authority, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished.

However, the crime of this case seems to have occurred contingent, the defendant's name and behavior, health, family relationship, etc., including the fact that the crime of this case seems to have been committed, the fact that the defendant is divided and reflected in the present mistake, and that the defendant's will want the defendant's wife, shall be determined like the order.