마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
As seized marijuana 277.61g (Evidence 1), Cocar 3.01g (Evidence 2), electronic lives.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall smoke or import marijuana, and no person, other than a handler of narcotics, shall import a kylcos who are narcotics, and the defendant is not a handler of narcotics.
1. On March 2017, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a manner that inhales tobacco paper by attaching a flash in the street near the Defendant’s residence in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and then inhales it.
2. The Defendant, who imported marijuana and coaches, has paid the price in advance to “D”, a person residing in the U.S., and requested the Defendant to send narcotics, etc., such as marijuana. On April 6, 2017, the Defendant, at around 15:15, sent it to the Incheon Airport located in the Jung-gu Incheon Airport, Jung-gu, Incheon, for entry into this country approximately 277.61g and approximately 3.01g of the hemp, which arrive at the Incheon Airport, and around 17:30 on April 10, 2017, was delivered at the front parking lot of 1202, Nowon-gu, Seoul.
Accordingly, the defendant imported marijuana and cocar simultaneously.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Notification of the results of each legal chemical appraisal;
1. Each protocol of seizure (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant purchased and imported marijuana from "D" located in the United States, but, in the case of ccarin, the ccarin unilaterally sent it with "D" services or baitss, with "D" as its services or baitss, and that there was no intention as to the importation of ccarin, since there was no separate order.
However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the cocars imported and discovered by the Defendant together with marijuana, were about 3.01g, which correspond to about 100 times as the basis of the 0.03g of the inhaled volume per time, and ② the Defendant purchased marijuana at the investigative agency with USD 1,50 and the Defendant purchased it.
In the case of Cocar, US$ 100 shall be limited to 1g.
“A” statement was made by the Defendant, and even based on the Defendant’s statement, only US$ 1,500.