2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected against the Defendant.

However, the instant crime committed the instant crime because the Defendant acquired 15 million won from the damaged person for the purpose of managing the company, and the Defendant had the same record twice, and the Defendant committed the instant crime because he was not even two months after having been sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and was not recovered, and other various sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and changes of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., are not heavier than the sentence imposed by the lower court.

3. According to the conclusion, Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36442, Apr. 1, 200).