2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the fact that damage has not been repaid, and the victim wanted to be punished by the defendant, the sentencing of the court below seems to have been appropriately determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the defendant, and there is no special circumstance to the extent that the sentencing is changed ex post facto, so the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.