However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On July 5, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Daegu District Court, and on December 28, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court.

[2] Although Defendant 1 had been punished for drinking more than twice as above, Defendant 2 driven a B-te motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.129% from a 100-meter section of blood alcohol level to the front road of about 100-dong, which is located in the Gu and Sinsi-si in the Gu and Sinsi-si, on March 8, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving at home, report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report (the same kind of force) and other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount of punishment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 and 55 (1) 3 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1448

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (restatement of the aforementioned circumstances);

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;