1. At around 21:20 on July 14, 2015, the Defendant, when the victim D (years 35) in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was drunk in front of the entrance of the “Eel” working as an employee, was asked by the said victim to “a request from the said victim to stop the teel entrance, cut off, and turn off the teel entrance,” then the victim was pushed off with the front door.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. 모욕 피고인은 위 제1항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 위 D의 신고를 받고 출동한 서울종로경찰서 소속 경위인 피해자 F에게, 위 D, D의 동료인 G, 성명불상의 포장마차 손님들 10여명이 지켜보고 있는 가운데 큰 소리로 “야 이 짭새 새끼야, 너희들 모텔이랑 한통속이냐, 돈 처먹지 말고 사건을 정당하게 처리하라, 좆같은 새끼야, 당장 모가지를 떼어 버리겠다”라고 말하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

3. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위 제1항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 위와 같은 폭행죄의 현행범인으로 체포되어 순찰차에 탑승하는 과정에서 서울종로경찰서 경사 H의 배를 오른발로 1회 걷어차고, 이후 I 파출소에서 재차 H의 배를 오른발로 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of part of the defendant in the second trial records of this case (the point of violence)

1. Each statement of the aforementioned witnesses in the protocol of examination of the witness witness D, F and H;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, and F;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of CCTV-cape photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;