When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 12, 2015, at around 13:00, the Defendant danced with the victim E (58 taxes) in a D factory located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and caused the victim to go beyond a bridge under the gold Decree by leaving the victim’s body back to the face with aground and drinking with the victim’s face, and caused the victim to go beyond a bridge under the gold Decree for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant, like Paragraph 1, is difficult to determine the market price of the mold of this case with the presumption of future medical treatment costs in the market because the mold, which had been frighting to the victim’s face while selling it to drink the victim’s face, falls on the floor, and thus, the market price of the mold of this case cannot be determined by the market price.

The framework of the victim was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness E’s legal statement (if each of the witness’s statements and comparisons with the investigation agency, not only are consistent in the main part of the crime, but also there is no contradiction with the injury diagnosis, its credibility is recognized);

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant (E substitute part);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;