A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 30, 2017, around 18:05, the Defendant: (a) demanded the Defendant to demand KRW 50,000 of the money lent by the victim B (79 tax) to the Defendant; and (b) was unable to open and depart from the head door of the Defendant’s vehicle; (c) while the Defendant had a dispute with the victim, he/she sawd the victim’s breath, and caused the Defendant’s injury to the bridge, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

B. At around 18:20 on the same day, the Defendant, within the above F Office, was in contact with the Defendant, and was in contact with the Victim G (50) who was found to have been in contact with the Defendant, caused the Defendant to face the victim’s breath by breading and pushing ahead with the Defendant’s breath, thereby causing the Defendant to inflict an injury on the Defendant, such as catdum dump, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place described in Section 1. A, the Defendant assaulted the victim by breathing the breath’s breath and sculing the breath with the victim A (51) for the said reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment of photographs of damaged parts), each medical certificate, and the place of occurrence of photographs;

1. Defendant A of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of each fine);

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for judgment and sentencing as to the Defendants’ assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the Defendants unilaterally committed violence and did not exercise the power of force against the other party.

However, according to the statements made by H, I and investigative agencies as witnesses investigated by this court, each of the facts charged against the Defendants is recognized.

The Defendants stated that the Defendants did not perform their duties.