2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the bags containing the Defendant’s garbage are sealed above the body of the damaged person’s vehicle, and the surface of the damaged person’s vehicle is confirmed; ② the operator of the imported specialized maintenance business establishment that issued a estimate to the injured person’s vehicle, and ② the victim’s vehicle was flicked by the investigative agency and the court of the court below, “The victim’s vehicle was flicked with the main flick part, and the flick force was caused by the soil or stone contained in the bags containing garbage. Such flick force can be caused by the soil or stone contained in the bags, and the direction of the flick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick bl.

In full view of the fact that the defendant stated to the purport, the fact that he was placed in the main set of the damaged person's vehicle and damaged the vehicle can be sufficiently recognized as having caused garbage, such as facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.