beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.03 2015고정220

협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant sent to the post office located in the Dongcheon-dong, Gwangju Metropolitan City, a content-certified mail to the victim C, stating that “The Defendant would have prepared and thoroughly carried out the correspondence by the date on which the truth, such as accepting a written petition from the public prosecutor’s office, requesting news gathering from the media companies, such as TV, etc., is revealed. In addition, if you feel wrong until E’s birth is completed, I would like to know that E’s family members or him/her would have to die together with his/her family members and with him/her that he/she would cause any harm to the body of the victim or his/her family.”

2. On May 16, 2014, the Defendant sent a postal item to the said victim, “Contents Certification,” under the title of “Contents Certification,” and expressed the attitude that the said victim would inform the media of the fact that the victim would not deliver corporeal movables claimed by the Defendant without delivering corporeal movables to the victim, or to file a criminal complaint.”

3. On May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that the victim C would have any harm and injury to the body of the victim while taking the Defendant’s bath at the law court of Gwangju District Court 251 located in Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gwangju; and (b) expressed the attitude that the victim C would have any harm and injury to the body of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The phrase contained in the facts set forth in No. 1 of each ruling of content certification is sufficient to understand that the defendant is able to agree with the victim or his family members, and the phrase contained in the facts set forth in No. 2 of the ruling is sufficient to inform the press of the criminal defendant's demand for delivery of corporeal movables against the victim and if the defendant does not comply with it